Skip to content

fix: properly floor the partial results in DateDayDifference #1629

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Mar 4, 2024

Conversation

vil02
Copy link
Member

@vil02 vil02 commented Mar 4, 2024

Open in Gitpod know more

Describe your change:

Currently DateDayDifference('29/02/2024', '04/03/2024') gives 5. This PR fixes that. Further more:

  • the errors now are thrown,

  • the tests are reorganized; edited test cases were verified with the page linked in the docs,

  • some minor refactoring was done.

  • Add an algorithm?

  • Fix a bug or typo in an existing algorithm?

  • Documentation change?

Checklist:

  • I have read CONTRIBUTING.md.
  • This pull request is all my own work -- I have not plagiarized.
  • I know that pull requests will not be merged if they fail the automated tests.
  • This PR only changes one algorithm file. To ease review, please open separate PRs for separate algorithms.
  • All new JavaScript files are placed inside an existing directory.
  • All filenames should use the UpperCamelCase (PascalCase) style. There should be no spaces in filenames.
    Example:UserProfile.js is allowed but userprofile.js,Userprofile.js,user-Profile.js,userProfile.js are not
  • All new algorithms have a URL in their comments that points to Wikipedia or another similar explanation.
  • If this pull request resolves one or more open issues then the commit message contains Fixes: #{$ISSUE_NO}.

@codecov-commenter
Copy link

codecov-commenter commented Mar 4, 2024

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 83.91%. Comparing base (83b4dd8) to head (3368c0d).

Additional details and impacted files
@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##           master    #1629      +/-   ##
==========================================
+ Coverage   83.89%   83.91%   +0.01%     
==========================================
  Files         377      377              
  Lines       19736    19733       -3     
  Branches     2916     2919       +3     
==========================================
+ Hits        16558    16559       +1     
+ Misses       3178     3174       -4     

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

@vil02 vil02 force-pushed the fix_DateDayDifference branch from ee9ca06 to 4366be9 Compare March 4, 2024 17:00
@vil02 vil02 force-pushed the fix_DateDayDifference branch from 4366be9 to 3368c0d Compare March 4, 2024 17:03
@vil02 vil02 marked this pull request as ready for review March 4, 2024 17:06
Copy link
Collaborator

@appgurueu appgurueu left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thanks. BTW, CheckDayAndMonth should ideally compute how many days a month has (based on the year) and check against that (you don't need to do this though).

@vil02
Copy link
Member Author

vil02 commented Mar 4, 2024

CheckDayAndMonth should ideally compute how many days a month has (based on the year) and check against that (you don't need to do this though).

A function like ParseSimpleDate could be used both in DateToDay and DateDayDifference (i.e. the input would be a string "24/03/2024" and the output would be some kind of tuple with day, month and year). It should also check if the resulting date is correct (including correct number of days for given month). I was planning to spend some time on it after this and #1628 are merged.

@raklaptudirm raklaptudirm merged commit f13eec1 into TheAlgorithms:master Mar 4, 2024
@vil02 vil02 deleted the fix_DateDayDifference branch March 5, 2024 09:01
@vil02 vil02 mentioned this pull request Mar 18, 2024
6 tasks
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants